Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Emerging Technologies Artificial Intelligence
Question: Discuss about theEmerging Technologiesfor Artificial Intelligence. Answer: Is Artificial Intelligence a Threat to Humanity? When any discussion on artificial intelligence (AI) takes place it is conducted on very generic and vague grounds. It is a somewhat truth that AI could someday affect the people in some adverse way. It would have universal effects on some specific situations or industries (Berlatsky, 2011). For instance, if we have to reduce the huge traffic of the mega city what we might probably do, we would start coordinating and timing the traffic lights better. But there might be some other option such as closing all the routes from 6 to 11 a.m. that enters the city. This option does help in reduction of traffic but it does come within the range of common sense which may prevail due to artificial intelligence. Coordinating the traffic lights improperly can lead to serious accidents but the problem associated with AI is that letting the traffic go pale is no option to consider and thus prevails a broader and grave issues such as the use of weapons which might bring disaster (Parivazhagan and Mak, 2011). Renowned scientists Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk are in the opinion that the AI weapon control systems or weapons should be banned which does have the ability to attack targets without the involvement of any human direction. It is quite possible the course that the humans would follow towards the next century would be hugely affected by how the AI is being used. But it is of utmost importance that this should not be left to chance and should have a thorough understanding of the prevailing issues which would help us understand AI's use in more beneficial ways. While stressing over the headway of artificial intelligence is from every angle basically broad among experts, and the stress varies person to person. There are some experts who are in the opinion that the AI would backfire and wont prove to be for the betterment of the humans. Whereas some are of the opinion that AI would help out humans and not fight for overpowering the humans (Reese, 1985). AI does not only pose a threat of violence but it does have many other ways which may affect the humans. AI could interfere in our privacy, whose best example can be given as Facebook's system of facial recognition. This system helps in recognizing an individual and help tagging recommendations. But the system keeps on learning the pattern of the person's other traits too such as posture, dressing sense, etc. If these systems are used in security systems can it might have its effects. Expecting that artificial intelligence is some kind of threat to persons, it's vital to reflect to what amount any certified hazard at the degree of change that is going to happen. According to Aguirre, experts do suggest we are far from any super smart AI that is capable of any kind of hazard. But this does not at all mean that we wont take any cautious step until then. As the old phrase precaution is better than cure thus we should make this decisions on solid and future perspective grounds (Chrisley, 2003). Can Machines Think? Do the machines have the capability to think for themselves, is a very big prevailingquestion in the mind of the philosophers over the years? It is of more than academic centrality that we make sense of how to think doubtlessly about the unaffected biased strengths of computers, and are being brought into an agreement of delicate societal parts, where their controls will be verified in a comprehensive test: A huge participation of locals, we are almost making thyselves subservient upon their intellectual controls. The price of misjudging them could be massive (Hoffmann, 2010). Among them the vital innovators of the computer was the well-known mathematician Turing. He was the first to understand significantly stimulating terms, how to assemble a programmable reckoning device. Every programmable device being used today are the basic version of the Turing machines. Thirty years ago towards the beginning of this computer phase, Turing was the one who came up with an article titled does the computer machinery has the power to think for themselves? Then later on proceeded to say this was a dreadful question to ask, a question which has no sense and is unreasonably immaterial, making it difficult to legitimacy talk (Bunch et al., 2015). A small reflection will persuade us that, adjacent to odds of a generations, it is quite tough to judge a man or woman clearly. Then Turing said, if we put computer in the place of man or woman then it would be same and typically impossible of what it can do or capable of doing. Right away, comprehend that failing this test shouldn't be an indication of nonappearance of understanding. Various clever people, taking all things into account, won't not will or prepared to play the farce delight, and we must allow computers similar opportunity to rot to validate themselves (Bunch et al., 2015). This is, then, a limited test; falling level it exhibits nothing. In addition, Turing was not submitting himself to the view in spite of the way that it is definitely not inflexible to assume how one might think he/she was that to contemplate is to reflect just like any other individual than he was bestowing himself/herself to view what a man is capable of doing, he must to think exactly like a female. Everybody including the computers may all have contradictory strategies for thinking. Nevertheless, if one can think of one's own precise unusual style to duplicate for a thinking human, one can think in particular, no doubt. This fictional rehearsing has come to be known as the Turing test. It is a grievous incoherency that suggestion made by Turning has had accurately the regressive effect on the thinking of that which he decided (Think you can just let loose with your thoughts on social media? Think again! 2013). References Berlatsky, N. (2011).Artificial intelligence. Detroit: Greenhaven Press. Bunch, L., Bradshaw, J., Hoffman, R. and Johnson, M. (2015). Principles for human-centered interaction design, Part 2: Can humans and machines think together?.IEEE Intelligent Systems, 30(3), pp.68-75. Chrisley, R. (2003). Embodied artificial intelligence.Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), pp.131-150. Hoffmann, A. (2010). Can Machines Think? An Old Question Reformulated.Minds and Machines, 20(2), pp.203-212. Parivazhagan, A. and Mak, P. (2011). Can Artificial Intelligence Be Realized, and Will it Benefit Humanity? [The Way I See it].IEEE Potentials, 30(2), pp.6-7. Reese, D. (1985). Artificial intelligence.Artificial Intelligence, 27(1), pp.127-128. Think you can just let loose with your thoughts on social media? Think again!. (2013).The Pharmaceutical Journal.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.